Using Content-Based Reading Materials for Academic Reading
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/1.4.2017.730-743Palabras clave:
Reading, comprehension, cognition, strategies, didactics configuration.Resumen
This text explores the conceptual developments useful as theoretical support to the Project “Metacognitive Strategies in the Teaching and Learning of Reading”, which are related to the notion that reading underlies the work, the strategies (cognitive and metacognitive) and its role in the reading didactics; moreover, some aspects showed are related to the didactic design proposal, the unit didactic, the didactic planning, and the elements that constitute it.Descargas
Citas
Abromitis, B. (1994). The role of metacognition in reading comprehension: implications for instruction. Literacy Research Report, 19, 1–31.
Alderson, J.C., & Bachman, E.I. (2000) Assessing Reading. Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Bamett, M.A, (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension. Modem Lang.72, 150-162.
Fitzgerald, J. (1995). English-as-a-second-language learners’ cognitive reading processes: a review of research in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 65,145–190.
Freeman, Y., & Freeman, D. (2003). Struggling English language learners: keys for academic success. TESOL Journal, 12(3), 5–10.
Garner, R. (1992). Metacognition and self-monitoring strategies. In S. J. Samuels, & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 236–252). Newmark, DE: International Reading Association.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (Eds.). (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow, UK.: Longman.
Guariento, W., & Morley, J. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 55(4), 347–353.
Hamsa A., Puteh-Behak f.,and Mohd H. (2015) Examining EFl Secondary Reading Curriculum in Iraqi Kurdista. Applied Sciences, 2015 ISSN 1812-5654
Hancock, O.H. (1998). Reading skills for college students (4th ed.). Upper Saddle Rivers, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hudson, T. (2007). Teaching second language reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. London and New York: Routledge.
Joshi, R.M. (2005). Vocabulary: A critical component of comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 209–219.
Joshi, R.M., & Aaron, P.G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85–97.
Kuzborska, I. (2010). The relationship between EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading instruction to advanced learners of English in a Lithuanian University context. Colchester, UK: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex.
Kuzborska, I. (2011) Teachers’ decision-making processes when designing EAP reading materials in a Lithuanian university setting, English for Academic Purposes.
Martin-Chang, S.Y., & Gould, O.N. (2008). Revisiting print exposure: Exploring differential links to vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate. Research in Reading, 31, 273–284.
Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Oxford: Macmillan Education.
Schmitt, M. C., & Baumann, J. F. (1990). Meta-comprehension during basal reader instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 1–13.
Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing materials for language teaching. London: Continuum.
