Fracasos en restauraciones adhesivas en pacientes que acuden a la Facultad de Odontología en Ecuador. Una revisión sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/9.(2).abril.2025.387-404Palabras clave:
Restauraciones adhesivas, Fracaso clínico, Filtración marginal, Revisión sistemática, Sostenibilidad en odontologíaResumen
Las restauraciones adhesivas representan un pilar en la odontología restauradora contemporánea por su efectividad funcional y estética. No obstante, el fracaso clínico de estas restauraciones sigue siendo una preocupación, especialmente en contextos universitarios donde se combinan formación clínica y atención a pacientes. Esta revisión sistemática tuvo como objetivo identificar, analizar y sintetizar los principales factores asociados al fracaso de restauraciones adhesivas en pacientes que acuden a la Facultad de Odontología. Se aplicó la metodología PRISMA 2020 para la selección rigurosa de estudios publicados entre 2000 y 2025. La búsqueda se realizó en bases de datos científicas como PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science y SciELO. Se incluyeron estudios observacionales y ensayos clínicos en humanos, redactados en inglés o español. La calidad metodológica fue evaluada con herramientas como CASPe y el índice de sesgo. De los 317 estudios inicialmente identificados, se incluyeron 34 que cumplían con los criterios de elegibilidad. Los principales factores de fracaso identificados fueron la filtración marginal, desadaptación cavitaria, fracturas del material, sensibilidad postoperatoria y caries secundaria. También se halló una relación significativa entre la experiencia clínica del operador y la durabilidad de las restauraciones. La falta de seguimiento clínico sistemático fue una limitante frecuente. Esta revisión sistemática resalta la necesidad de mejorar tanto los protocolos clínicos como la formación profesional en restauraciones adhesivas. Además, promueve una visión ecológica al considerar el impacto ambiental del reemplazo frecuente de materiales dentales.Descargas
Citas
Afrashtehfar, K. I., Ahmadi, M., Emami, E., Abi-Nader, S., & Tamimi, F. (2017). Failure of single-unit restorations on root filled posterior teeth: a systematic review. International Endodontic Journal, 50(10), 951–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/IEJ.12723
Al-Ahdal, K., & Opdam, N. (2022). Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 127, 104309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104309
Aliaga, I., De Paz, J. F., Vera, V., García, A., & Bajo, J. (2020). Prediction and failure analysis of composite resin restorations in the posterior sector applied in teaching dental students. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(11), 4537–4544. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12652-020-01804-7
Alvarenga, M., Machado, L., Prado, A., Veloso, S., & Monteiro, G. (2024). Self-adhesive resin cement versus conventional cements on the failure rate of indirect single-tooth restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.027
Barros, T. A. de F., Takeuchi, E. V., Souza, C. de M. S., Silva, A. M., Alencar, C. de M., & Silva, C. M. (2024). Marginal Degradation of Universal Adhesive Restorations in NCCLs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The Open Dentistry Journal, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/0118742106334186240906093559
Braga, M. M., Oliveira, L. B., Chisini, L. A., & Cenci, M. S. (2021). Factors influencing the failure of direct composite restorations in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Investigations, 25, 4865–4882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03856-0
Casagrande, L., Seminario, A., Corrêa, M., Werle, S., Maltz, M., Demarco, F., & Araújo, F. (2017). Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 21, 847-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1832-1.
Cascales, Á., Sauro, S., Hirata, R., Astudillo-Rubio, D., Cascales, R., Agustín-Panadero, R., & Delgado-Gaete, A. (2023). Total Rehabilitation Using Adhesive Dental Restorations in Patients with Severe Tooth Wear: A 5-Year Retrospective Case Series Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165222.
Çokako?lu, S., & K?z?lda?, A. (2022). Comparison of periodontal status and failure rates with different retainer bonding methods and adhesives: a randomized clinical trail.. The Angle orthodontist. https://doi.org/10.2319/031622-224.1.
Comba, A., Baldi, A., Carossa, M., Paolone, G., Stura, I., Migliaretti, G., & Scotti, N. (2023). A Three-step Etch-and-Rinse vs a Universal Adhesive in Nanohybrid Composite Anterior Restorations: A Retrospective Clinical Evaluation. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 25. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b4043039.
Demarco, F. F., Collares, K., Correa, M. B., Cenci, M. S., Moraes, R. R., & Opdam, N. J. (2017). Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing? Brazilian Oral Research, 31(suppl 1), e56. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0056
Gatti, A., Tjäderhane, L., & Breschi, L. (2023). Interfacial degradation of resin-dentin bonds: A review of the current understanding and future challenges. Biomedicines, 11(5), 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051256
Gheorghiu, I.-M., Perlea, P., Iliescu, A. A., Onu, M. S., & Sc?rl?tescu, S. (2023). The causes of adhesive direct dental restorations failures. Revista Român? de Stomatologie, 69(2), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.37897/rjs.2023.2.1
Heintze, S. D., Loguercio, A. D., Hanzen, T. A., Reis, A., & Rousson, V. (2022). Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 38(5), e109–e135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.018
Hollanders, A., Kuper, N., Bronkhorst, E., Laske, M., & Huysmans, M. (2023). Effectiveness of adhesive containing MDPB: A practice-based clinical trial.. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.06.011.
Klink, A., Groten, M., & Huettig, F. (2017). Complete rehabilitation of compromised full dentitions with adhesively bonded all-ceramic single-tooth restorations: Long-term outcome in patients with and without amelogenesis imperfecta.. Journal of dentistry, 70, 51-58 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.011.
Maier, E., Crins, L., Pereira-Cenci, T., Bronkhorst, E., Opdam, N., Galler, K., & Loomans, B. (2024). 5.5-year-survival of CAD/CAM resin-based composite restorations in severe tooth wear patients. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 40(5), 767–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2024.03.001
Mario, D., Mario, A., Allegra, C., Andrea, B., Giuseppe, T., Milena, C., Annalisa, M., Lorenzo, B., Lorenzo, L., & Nicola, S. (2022). The influence of indirect bonded restorations on clinical prognosis of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.018.
McGrath, C. E., & Bonsor, S. J. (2022). Survival of direct resin composite onlays and indirect tooth-coloured adhesive onlays in posterior teeth: a systematic review. British Dental Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4395-3
Mendes, L. T., Pedrotti, D., Casagrande, L., & Lenzi, T. L. (2022). Risk of failure of repaired versus replaced defective direct restorations in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical oral investigations, 26(7), 4917–4927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04459-0
Opdam, N. J. M., Bronkhorst, E. M., Loomans, B. A. C., & Huysmans, M. C. D. N. J. M. (2010). 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. Journal of Dental Research, 89(10), 1063–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510376071
Opdam, N. J., van de Sande, F. H., Bronkhorst, E., Cenci, M. S., Bottenberg, P., Pallesen, U., Gaengler, P., Lindberg, A., Huysmans, M. C., & van Dijken, J. W. (2014). Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dental research, 93(10), 943–949. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514544217
Peumans, M., Kanumilli, P., Munck, J., Landuyt, K., Lambrechts, P., & Meerbeek, B. (2005). Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials.. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 21 9, 864-81 . https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2006.02.019.
Rasimick, B. J., Wan, J., Musikant, B. L., & Deutsch, A. S. (2010). A review of failure modes in teeth restored with adhesively luted endodontic dowels. Journal of Prosthodontics, 19(8), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1532-849X.2010.00647.X
Ruiz, L., Nicoloso, G., Franzon, R., Lenzi, T., Araújo, F., & Casagrande, L. (2019). Repair increases the survival of failed primary teeth restorations in high–caries risk children: a university-based retrospective study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 24, 71 - 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02899-9.
Schwendicke, F., & Göstemeyer, G. (2021). Understanding and managing restoration failure in dental practice: From risk assessment to intervention. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 48(S22), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13431
Sequeira-Byron, P., Fedorowicz, Z., Carter, B., Nasser, M., & Alrowaili, E. F. (2015). Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015(9), CD009109. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009109.pub3
Souza-Oliveira, A., Paschoal, M., Rezende, T., Alvarenga-Brant, R., Abreu, M., & Martins-Pfeifer, C. (2024). Adhesive restorations in primary dentition: A retrospective analysis of survival rate and associated factors.. International journal of paediatric dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13190.
Tekçe, N., Demirci, M., Sancak, E. I., Güder, G., Tuncer, S., & Baydemir, C. (2022). Clinical Performance of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations in Patients with Amelogenesis Imperfecta. Operative dentistry, 47(6), 620–629. https://doi.org/10.2341/21-106-C
Tekçe, N., Demirci, M., Tuncer, S., Güder, G., & Sancak, E. I. (2022). Clinical Performance of Direct Composite Restorations in Patients with Amelogenesis Imperfecta - Anterior Restorations. The journal of adhesive dentistry, 24, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2838105
Vieira, B., Dantas, E. L. de A., Cavalcanti, Y. W., Santiago, B. M., & Sousa, F. B. de. (2021). Comparison of Self-Etching Adhesives and Etch-and-Rinse Adhesives on the Failure Rate of Posterior Composite Resin Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0041-1736332
Weber, K. R., Wierichs, R. J., Meyer-Lueckel, H., & Flury, S. (2021). Restoration of teeth affected by molar-incisor hypomineralisation: a systematic review. Swiss dental journal, 131(12), 988–997. https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2021-12-764
Yoshihara, K., Yoshida, Y., & Van Meerbeek, B. (2022). Is there one optimal adhesive strategy for all clinical cases? Journal of Dentistry, 125, 104278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104278
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 José Luis Egas Sánchez, Rosa Viviana Tutasi Benítez, Carol Andrea Gavilanes Sánchez, Lenin Stalin Suasnabas Pacheco
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
